Discussion about this post

User's avatar
LAV O’Reilly's avatar

I went to the March in Sydney on Saturday with my son. I’m grieving the loss of my daughter, my son his only sibling/sister as a result of trauma from mens violence. I have done what I’m capable of doing to protest/support/advocate for Palestine. It was so clear on Saturday that when the conversations of the speakers turned to colonisers/First Nations people and then to Palestine and how these were intrinsically linked to violence, the energy of the crowd shifted. People were uncomfortable, sighing, talking and laughing. People left. And some comments by women on social media later described the disappoint they felt because they’d been marching for violence against “Australian” women and the organisers should have addressed that “first”. I asked the question - why is some violence more acceptable to people than others?? Thank you Clem for speaking out on this and providing information how the violence is linked. Men (and women) see every day that violence is not only acceptable, but celebrated by certain governments. Why would men see they need to change anything, when they’re seeing a genocide being live streamed and the most powerful men in the world are right there, cheering it on without consequence. I definitely don’t want to live in or advocate for a world where people think killing “them” is fine but don’t kill us!!

Expand full comment
Liz's avatar

Well said and I am so glad you have said this outloud. Each Sunday in Melbourne the Ceasefire protest starts at 12pm at The State Library and there are always a huge number of amazing and inspiring people who attend in peace and with love. Last Sunday I thought there would be so many more men and women there as the violence against women march was literally just before this at 10am and started at the State Library as well. Why didn't they all just stay in the city and come along?? I don't understand either.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts